Full House Resorts Inc (FLL)vsLas Vegas Sands Corp (LVS)
FLL
Full House Resorts Inc
$2.30
+3.60%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $88.50M
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp
$54.17
-1.33%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $37.12B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Las Vegas Sands Corp generates 4240% more annual revenue ($13.02B vs $299.92M). LVS leads profitability with a 12.5% profit margin vs -13.4%. FLL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.66. LVS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).
FLL
Hold39
out of 100
Grade: F
LVS
Strong Buy71
out of 100
Grade: B
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for FLL.
Margin of Safety
+47.5%
Fair Value
$109.98
Current Price
$54.17
$55.81 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Every $100 of equity generates 73 in profit
Growing faster than its price suggests
Strong operational efficiency at 23.9%
Revenue surging 26.0% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 29.3% YoY
Areas to Watch
3.0% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Operating margin of 4.4%
ROE of -101.4% — below average capital efficiency
Trading at 23.0x book value
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FLL
The strongest argument for FLL centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.66 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : LVS
The strongest argument for LVS centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 26.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.95 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FLL
The primary concerns for FLL are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Operating Margin.
Bear Case : LVS
The primary concerns for LVS are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 10.15 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FLL profiles as a turnaround stock while LVS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
FLL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.34 — expect wider price swings.
LVS is growing revenue faster at 26.0% — sustainability is the question.
LVS generates stronger free cash flow (930M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
LVS scores higher overall (71/100 vs 39/100) and 26.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Full House Resorts Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESORTS & CASINOS · USA
Full House Resorts, Inc. owns, develops, invests, operates, manages and leases casinos and related hospitality and entertainment facilities in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Las Vegas Sands Corp
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESORTS & CASINOS · USA
Las Vegas Sands Corporation is an American casino and resort company based in Paradise, Nevada, United States. Its resorts feature accommodations, gambling and entertainment, convention and exhibition facilities, restaurants and clubs, as well as an art and science museum in Singapore.
Visit Website →Compare with Other RESORTS & CASINOS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?