WallStSmart

Fulgent Genetics Inc (FLGT)vsNatera Inc (NTRA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Natera Inc generates 736% more annual revenue ($2.71B vs $323.93M). NTRA leads profitability with a -7.1% profit margin vs -26.1%. FLGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 42/100 (D).

FLGT

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 7.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 7.36

NTRA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLGTUndervalued (+55.0%)

Margin of Safety

+55.0%

Fair Value

$51.10

Current Price

$20.45

$30.65 discount

UndervaluedFair: $51.10Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NTRA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLGT3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
7.3610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

NTRA2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
37.7%10/10

Revenue surging 37.7% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.139/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FLGT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$539.02M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-8.4%2/10

ROE of -8.4% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-98.6%2/10

Earnings declined 98.6%

NTRA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
25.9x2/10

Trading at 25.9x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.6%2/10

ROE of -10.6% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLGT

The strongest argument for FLGT centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 1.32 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NTRA

The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 37.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FLGT

The primary concerns for FLGT are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : NTRA

The primary concerns for NTRA are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLGT profiles as a turnaround stock while NTRA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

NTRA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.53 — expect wider price swings.

NTRA is growing revenue faster at 37.7% — sustainability is the question.

NTRA generates stronger free cash flow (-9M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FLGT scores higher overall (42/100 vs 31/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fulgent Genetics Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Fulgent Genetics, Inc., provides COVID-19 testing and genetic testing services to physicians with clinically actionable diagnostic information. The company is headquartered in Temple City, California.

Natera Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?