WallStSmart

Fulgent Genetics Inc (FLGT)vsNatera Inc (NTRA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Natera Inc generates 681% more annual revenue ($2.50B vs $320.35M). NTRA leads profitability with a -9.1% profit margin vs -23.0%. FLGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

FLGT

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 7.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 7.36

NTRA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLGTUndervalued (+54.8%)

Margin of Safety

+54.8%

Fair Value

$50.88

Current Price

$18.14

$32.74 discount

UndervaluedFair: $50.88Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NTRA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLGT3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
7.3610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

NTRA2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
38.8%10/10

Revenue surging 38.8% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FLGT4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$543.87M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.0%2/10

ROE of -7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-98.6%2/10

Earnings declined 98.6%

NTRA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
17.3x4/10

Trading at 17.3x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.8%2/10

ROE of -12.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLGT

The strongest argument for FLGT centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 1.32 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NTRA

The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 38.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FLGT

The primary concerns for FLGT are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : NTRA

The primary concerns for NTRA are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLGT profiles as a turnaround stock while NTRA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

NTRA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.54 — expect wider price swings.

NTRA is growing revenue faster at 38.8% — sustainability is the question.

NTRA generates stronger free cash flow (18M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FLGT scores higher overall (40/100 vs 31/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fulgent Genetics Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Fulgent Genetics, Inc., provides COVID-19 testing and genetic testing services to physicians with clinically actionable diagnostic information. The company is headquartered in Temple City, California.

Natera Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?