WallStSmart

FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP)vsGraham Holdings Co (GHC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Graham Holdings Co generates 669% more annual revenue ($5.07B vs $659.21M). GHC leads profitability with a 10.7% profit margin vs -83.4%. GHC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

FIP

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.16

GHC

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.17
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FIPSignificantly Overvalued (-26.9%)

Margin of Safety

-26.9%

Fair Value

$4.91

Current Price

$3.31

$1.60 premium

UndervaluedFair: $4.91Overvalued
GHCSignificantly Overvalued (-25.1%)

Margin of Safety

-25.1%

Fair Value

$886.88

Current Price

$1138.57

$251.69 premium

UndervaluedFair: $886.88Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FIP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.7%10/10

Revenue surging 52.7% year-over-year

GHC5 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
676.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 676.0% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FIP4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$399.45M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-51.0%2/10

ROE of -51.0% — below average capital efficiency

GHC2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
6.3%3/10

ROE of 6.3% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
4.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FIP

The strongest argument for FIP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 52.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : GHC

The strongest argument for GHC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : FIP

The primary concerns for FIP are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.47 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : GHC

The primary concerns for GHC are Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FIP profiles as a hypergrowth stock while GHC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

FIP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.91 — expect wider price swings.

FIP is growing revenue faster at 52.7% — sustainability is the question.

GHC generates stronger free cash flow (33M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GHC scores higher overall (68/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

FTAI Infrastructure Inc.

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

FTAI Infrastructure Inc. focuses on acquiring, developing and operating assets and businesses that represent infrastructure for clients in the transportation and energy industries.

Visit Website →

Graham Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Graham Holdings Company is a diversified global media and education company. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?