WallStSmart

Figma, Inc. (FIG)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 4210% more annual revenue ($55.23B vs $1.28B). UBER leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs -123.2%. UBER appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 5.67. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

FIG

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.42

UBER

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FIG.

UBERUndervalued (+8.4%)

Margin of Safety

+8.4%

Fair Value

$71.22

Current Price

$68.60

$2.62 discount

UndervaluedFair: $71.22Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FIG2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
48.2%10/10

Revenue surging 48.2% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

UBER5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
85.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 85.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$133.28B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
14.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.79B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FIG4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
7.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-106.8%2/10

ROE of -106.8% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-51.2%2/10

Earnings declined 51.2%

UBER2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.672/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FIG

The strongest argument for FIG centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 48.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 13.3%. Revenue growth of 12.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FIG

The primary concerns for FIG are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FIG profiles as a hypergrowth stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

FIG is growing revenue faster at 48.2% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - APPLICATION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (67/100 vs 31/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins and 12.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Figma, Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Fortress Investment Group LLC is a publicly owned investment manager. The company is headquartered in New York City.

Visit Website →

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?