WallStSmart

Ferguson Plc (FERG)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 145% more annual revenue ($77.01B vs $31.45B). LMT leads profitability with a 8.2% profit margin vs 6.3%. LMT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.01. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).

FERG

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 4/9

LMT

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FERGSignificantly Overvalued (-79.2%)

Margin of Safety

-79.2%

Fair Value

$149.16

Current Price

$222.54

$73.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $149.16Overvalued
LMTSignificantly Overvalued (-48.6%)

Margin of Safety

-48.6%

Fair Value

$352.84

Current Price

$524.19

$171.35 premium

UndervaluedFair: $352.84Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FERG1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
32.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

LMT4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
71.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 72 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
443.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 443.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$120.98B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.92B8/10

Generating 2.9B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FERG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.3%3/10

6.3% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.033/10

Elevated debt levels

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-199.04M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

LMT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Price/BookValuation
13.8x4/10

Trading at 13.8x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Debt/EquityHealth
2.341/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FERG

The strongest argument for FERG centers on Return on Equity. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 10.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.01 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FERG

The primary concerns for FERG are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.34 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FERG carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

LMT is growing revenue faster at 10.5% — sustainability is the question.

LMT generates stronger free cash flow (2.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (69/100 vs 59/100) and 10.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ferguson Plc

INDUSTRIALS · INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION · USA

Ferguson plc distributes plumbing and heating products in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and Central Europe. The company is headquartered in Wokingham, the United Kingdom.

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?