WallStSmart

EXACT Sciences Corporation (EXAS)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 16% more annual revenue ($3.77B vs $3.25B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs -6.4%. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

EXAS

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.01

WAT

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EXAS.

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-84.6%)

Margin of Safety

-84.6%

Fair Value

$178.29

Current Price

$365.36

$187.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $178.29Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EXAS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.1%8/10

Revenue surging 23.1% year-over-year

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.4%10/10

Revenue surging 91.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

EXAS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-8.7%2/10

ROE of -8.7% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.012/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.5x4/10

Trading at 8.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EXAS

The strongest argument for EXAS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : EXAS

The primary concerns for EXAS are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 45.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EXAS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.44 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.4% — sustainability is the question.

EXAS generates stronger free cash flow (120M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (50/100 vs 32/100) and 91.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

EXACT Sciences Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Exact Sciences Corporation offers cancer screening and diagnostic test products in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Madison, Wisconsin.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?