WallStSmart

ESCO Technologies Inc (ESE)vsFortive Corp (FTV)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fortive Corp generates 234% more annual revenue ($4.32B vs $1.29B). ESE leads profitability with a 24.4% profit margin vs 12.4%. FTV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. ESE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

ESE

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.64

FTV

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.00

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ESE3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Profit MarginProfitability
24.4%9/10

Keeps 24 of every $100 in revenue as profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
24.8%8/10

Earnings expanding 24.8% YoY

FTV0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

ESE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.674/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
45.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

FTV2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
4.0%4/10

4.0% earnings growth

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ESE

The strongest argument for ESE centers on Debt/Equity, Profit Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.4% and operating margin at 14.8%. Revenue growth of 14.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FTV

PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ESE

The primary concerns for ESE are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 45.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : FTV

The primary concerns for FTV are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ESE profiles as a mature stock while FTV is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ESE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.05 — expect wider price swings.

ESE is growing revenue faster at 14.4% — sustainability is the question.

FTV generates stronger free cash flow (258M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ESE scores higher overall (60/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 24.4% margins and 14.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ESCO Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

ESCO Technologies Inc. produces and supplies products and systems designed for the industrial and commercial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Visit Website →

Fortive Corp

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Fortive is an American diversified industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?