WallStSmart

Ero Copper Corp (ERO)vsTronox Holdings PLC (TROX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Tronox Holdings PLC generates 216% more annual revenue ($2.92B vs $923.93M). ERO leads profitability with a 31.6% profit margin vs -15.8%. ERO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 78/100 (B+).

ERO

Strong Buy

78

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 10.0Profit: 9.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.16

TROX

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.77
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EROSignificantly Overvalued (-17.9%)

Margin of Safety

-17.9%

Fair Value

$26.73

Current Price

$25.28

$1.45 premium

UndervaluedFair: $26.73Overvalued
TROXUndervalued (+75.1%)

Margin of Safety

+75.1%

Fair Value

$33.73

Current Price

$6.06

$27.67 discount

UndervaluedFair: $33.73Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ERO6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
32.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
31.6%10/10

Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
34.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
110.4%10/10

Revenue surging 110.4% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TROX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
48.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 48.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

ERO0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

TROX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.0%4/10

3.0% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$973.10M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-35.8%2/10

ROE of -35.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ERO

The strongest argument for ERO centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.6% and operating margin at 34.7%. Revenue growth of 110.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TROX

The strongest argument for TROX centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : ERO

No major red flags identified for ERO, but monitor valuation.

Bear Case : TROX

The primary concerns for TROX are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ERO profiles as a growth stock while TROX is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

ERO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.58 — expect wider price swings.

ERO is growing revenue faster at 110.4% — sustainability is the question.

ERO generates stronger free cash flow (20M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ERO scores higher overall (78/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 31.6% margins and 110.4% revenue growth. TROX offers better value entry with a 75.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ero Copper Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · COPPER · USA

Ero Copper Corp. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Tronox Holdings PLC

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Tronox Holdings plc is a vertically integrated manufacturer of TiO2 pigment in North America, South and Central America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?