WallStSmart

Ero Copper Corp (ERO)vsSmith-Midland Corp (SMID)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ero Copper Corp generates 901% more annual revenue ($923.93M vs $92.32M). ERO leads profitability with a 31.6% profit margin vs 11.4%. ERO trades at a lower P/E of 8.6x. ERO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 78/100 (B+).

ERO

Strong Buy

78

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 10.0Profit: 9.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.16

SMID

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EROSignificantly Overvalued (-17.9%)

Margin of Safety

-17.9%

Fair Value

$26.73

Current Price

$25.28

$1.45 premium

UndervaluedFair: $26.73Overvalued
SMIDSignificantly Overvalued (-54.8%)

Margin of Safety

-54.8%

Fair Value

$21.81

Current Price

$29.25

$7.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $21.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ERO6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
32.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
31.6%10/10

Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
34.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
110.4%10/10

Revenue surging 110.4% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SMID5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.9010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
26.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
14.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ERO0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

SMID3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$151.77M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.0%2/10

Revenue declined 5.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-59.7%2/10

Earnings declined 59.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ERO

The strongest argument for ERO centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.6% and operating margin at 34.7%. Revenue growth of 110.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SMID

The strongest argument for SMID centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.20 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ERO

No major red flags identified for ERO, but monitor valuation.

Bear Case : SMID

The primary concerns for SMID are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ERO profiles as a growth stock while SMID is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

SMID carries more volatility with a beta of 1.72 — expect wider price swings.

ERO is growing revenue faster at 110.4% — sustainability is the question.

ERO generates stronger free cash flow (20M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ERO scores higher overall (78/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 31.6% margins and 110.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ero Copper Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · COPPER · USA

Ero Copper Corp. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Smith-Midland Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · BUILDING MATERIALS · USA

Smith-Midland Corporation invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells, and installs precast concrete products primarily for use in the construction, highway, utility, and agricultural industries. The company is headquartered in Midland, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?