WallStSmart

Ero Copper Corp (ERO)vsSmith-Midland Corp (SMID)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ero Copper Corp generates 1067% more annual revenue ($1.04B vs $89.50M). ERO leads profitability with a 29.8% profit margin vs 8.6%. ERO trades at a lower P/E of 11.6x. ERO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

ERO

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 9.5Value: 6.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.16

SMID

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EROOvervalued (-5.1%)

Margin of Safety

-5.1%

Fair Value

$29.96

Current Price

$32.19

$2.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $29.96Overvalued
SMIDSignificantly Overvalued (-60.7%)

Margin of Safety

-60.7%

Fair Value

$21.01

Current Price

$22.34

$1.33 premium

UndervaluedFair: $21.01Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ERO6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
32.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
37.6%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.6%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
73.9%10/10

Revenue surging 73.9% year-over-year

Profit MarginProfitability
29.8%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SMID5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.9010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
26.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
14.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ERO0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

SMID4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$112.46M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-10.8%2/10

Revenue declined 10.8%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-66.9%2/10

Earnings declined 66.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.41M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ERO

The strongest argument for ERO centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.8% and operating margin at 37.6%. Revenue growth of 73.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SMID

The strongest argument for SMID centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.20 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ERO

No major red flags identified for ERO, but monitor valuation.

Bear Case : SMID

The primary concerns for SMID are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ERO profiles as a growth stock while SMID is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SMID carries more volatility with a beta of 1.67 — expect wider price swings.

ERO is growing revenue faster at 73.9% — sustainability is the question.

ERO generates stronger free cash flow (52M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ERO scores higher overall (73/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 29.8% margins and 73.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ero Copper Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · COPPER · USA

Ero Copper Corp. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Smith-Midland Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · BUILDING MATERIALS · USA

Smith-Midland Corporation invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells, and installs precast concrete products primarily for use in the construction, highway, utility, and agricultural industries. The company is headquartered in Midland, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?