WallStSmart

Enerpac Tool Group Corp (EPAC)vsParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 3222% more annual revenue ($20.46B vs $615.91M). PH leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs 14.6%. EPAC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. EPAC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

EPAC

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.75

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EPACSignificantly Overvalued (-281.1%)

Margin of Safety

-281.1%

Fair Value

$11.29

Current Price

$37.48

$26.19 premium

UndervaluedFair: $11.29Overvalued
PHSignificantly Overvalued (-435.1%)

Margin of Safety

-435.1%

Fair Value

$186.12

Current Price

$921.56

$735.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $186.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EPAC2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Return on EquityProfitability
21.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$116.70B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

Areas to Watch

EPAC3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.98B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.7%2/10

Revenue declined 0.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-10.0%2/10

Earnings declined 10.0%

PH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.632/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EPAC

The strongest argument for EPAC centers on PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. PEG of 0.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bear Case : EPAC

The primary concerns for EPAC are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EPAC profiles as a declining stock while PH is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

PH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (768M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EPAC scores higher overall (55/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. The company is headquartered in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin.

Visit Website →

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?