WallStSmart

EOG Resources Inc (EOG)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

EOG Resources Inc generates 224% more annual revenue ($23.57B vs $7.27B). EOG leads profitability with a 23.3% profit margin vs 3.6%. EOG appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.40. EOG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 80/100 (A-).

EOG

Exceptional Buy

80

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.5Value: 8.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.87

RUSHA

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EOGUndervalued (+51.3%)

Margin of Safety

+51.3%

Fair Value

$242.54

Current Price

$130.03

$112.51 discount

UndervaluedFair: $242.54Overvalued
RUSHAUndervalued (+55.8%)

Margin of Safety

+55.8%

Fair Value

$164.81

Current Price

$72.31

$92.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $164.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EOG6 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Operating MarginProfitability
37.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.9%

Market CapQuality
$69.26B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
23.3%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.6%8/10

15.6% revenue growth

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

EOG1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Revenue declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EOG

The strongest argument for EOG centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.3% and operating margin at 37.9%. Revenue growth of 15.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : EOG

The primary concerns for EOG are Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EOG profiles as a growth stock while RUSHA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

RUSHA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

EOG is growing revenue faster at 15.6% — sustainability is the question.

EOG generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EOG scores higher overall (80/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 23.3% margins and 15.6% revenue growth. RUSHA offers better value entry with a 55.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

EOG Resources Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

EOG Resources, Inc. is an American energy company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in the Heritage Plaza building in Houston, Texas.

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?