WallStSmart

Enel Chile SA ADR (ENIC)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Enel Chile SA ADR generates 422% more annual revenue ($4.55B vs $871.93M). ENIC leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs 7.6%. ENIC trades at a lower P/E of 11.7x. ENIC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

ENIC

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.75

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ENICSignificantly Overvalued (-19.4%)

Margin of Safety

-19.4%

Fair Value

$3.65

Current Price

$4.53

$0.88 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.65Overvalued
KENSignificantly Overvalued (-40.1%)

Margin of Safety

-40.1%

Fair Value

$54.44

Current Price

$87.72

$33.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ENIC4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
162.9%10/10

Revenue surging 162.9% year-over-year

Operating MarginProfitability
27.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.8%

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ENIC2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-40.9%2/10

Earnings declined 40.9%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.752/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ENIC

The strongest argument for ENIC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 162.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ENIC

The primary concerns for ENIC are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ENIC profiles as a growth stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ENIC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.45 — expect wider price swings.

ENIC is growing revenue faster at 162.9% — sustainability is the question.

ENIC generates stronger free cash flow (332M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ENIC scores higher overall (56/100 vs 40/100) and 162.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Enel Chile SA ADR

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Enel Chile SA, an electricity services company, is engaged in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity in Chile. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Visit Website →

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?