WallStSmart

Emerson Electric Company (EMR)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Emerson Electric Company generates 35% more annual revenue ($18.32B vs $13.55B). EMR leads profitability with a 13.4% profit margin vs -1.6%. EMR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.77. EMR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

EMR

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.57

WPP

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EMR.

WPPUndervalued (+75.6%)

Margin of Safety

+75.6%

Fair Value

$75.12

Current Price

$18.97

$56.15 discount

UndervaluedFair: $75.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EMR3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$79.02B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
24.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.9%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.9% YoY

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EMR3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.774/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
32.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.9%4/10

2.9% revenue growth

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EMR

The strongest argument for EMR centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, EPS Growth.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : EMR

The primary concerns for EMR are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EMR profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

EMR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

EMR is growing revenue faster at 2.9% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EMR scores higher overall (59/100 vs 32/100). WPP offers better value entry with a 75.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Emerson Electric Company

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Emerson Electric Co. is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Ferguson, Missouri. The Fortune 500 company manufactures products and provides engineering services for a wide range of industrial, commercial, and consumer markets.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?