WallStSmart

Emera Incorporated (EMA)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Emera Incorporated generates 303% more annual revenue ($8.91B vs $2.21B). EMA leads profitability with a 12.0% profit margin vs -7.7%. EMA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.92. EMA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

EMA

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.59

TAC

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.19

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EMA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.5%

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TAC0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

EMA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.693/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.922/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.6%2/10

Earnings declined 5.6%

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.3x4/10

Trading at 11.3x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EMA

The strongest argument for EMA centers on Operating Margin, Price/Book.

Bull Case : TAC

TAC has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : EMA

The primary concerns for EMA are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 3.17 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EMA profiles as a value stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

EMA is growing revenue faster at 5.1% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (93M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

EMA scores higher overall (60/100 vs 33/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Emera Incorporated

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Emera Incorporated, an energy and services company, invests in generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in the United States, Canada, Barbados, and the Bahamas. The company is headquartered in Halifax, Canada.

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?