WallStSmart

Consolidated Edison Inc (ED)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Consolidated Edison Inc generates 1840% more annual revenue ($16.92B vs $871.93M). ED leads profitability with a 12.0% profit margin vs 7.6%. ED trades at a lower P/E of 19.4x. ED earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

ED

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 3.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 40.41

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EDSignificantly Overvalued (-42.0%)

Margin of Safety

-42.0%

Fair Value

$77.35

Current Price

$108.88

$31.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $77.35Overvalued
KENSignificantly Overvalued (-40.1%)

Margin of Safety

-40.1%

Fair Value

$54.44

Current Price

$87.72

$33.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ED2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
40.4110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.193/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.592/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-8.3%2/10

Earnings declined 8.3%

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ED

The strongest argument for ED centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ED

The primary concerns for ED are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ED profiles as a value stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.41 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

ED generates stronger free cash flow (176M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ED scores higher overall (55/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Consolidated Edison Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison (stylized as conEdison) or ConEd, is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $12 billion in annual revenues as of 2017, and over $48 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries.

Visit Website →

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?