WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsXPLR Infrastructure LP Unit (XIFR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 2576% more annual revenue ($31.79B vs $1.19B). DUK leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs -2.4%. DUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.68. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

DUK

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

XIFR

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-64.7%)

Margin of Safety

-64.7%

Fair Value

$78.65

Current Price

$129.55

$50.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $78.65Overvalued
XIFRUndervalued (+81.0%)

Margin of Safety

+81.0%

Fair Value

$58.45

Current Price

$10.35

$48.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $58.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$100.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.1%

XIFR1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.753/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.682/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Earnings declined 2.2%

XIFR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$975.01M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.943/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 28.1%.

Bull Case : XIFR

The strongest argument for XIFR centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.75 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : XIFR

The primary concerns for XIFR are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.94 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK profiles as a mature stock while XIFR is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

XIFR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

DUK is growing revenue faster at 8.0% — sustainability is the question.

XIFR generates stronger free cash flow (-397M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (59/100 vs 39/100), backed by strong 15.6% margins. XIFR offers better value entry with a 81.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

XPLR Infrastructure LP Unit

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - RENEWABLE · USA

XPLR Infrastructure, LP acquires, owns, and manages contracted clean energy projects in the United States. The company is headquartered in Juno Beach, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?