WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsTXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 1396% more annual revenue ($32.72B vs $2.19B). DUK leads profitability with a 15.7% profit margin vs 6.7%. DUK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.70. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

DUK

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

TXNM

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-52.3%)

Margin of Safety

-52.3%

Fair Value

$81.53

Current Price

$124.17

$42.64 premium

UndervaluedFair: $81.53Overvalued
TXNMOvervalued (-10.8%)

Margin of Safety

-10.8%

Fair Value

$53.56

Current Price

$58.99

$5.43 premium

UndervaluedFair: $53.56Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$97.35B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.5%

TXNM1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.753/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.58B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

TXNM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
5.4%3/10

ROE of 5.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.7% and operating margin at 25.5%. Revenue growth of 11.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TXNM

The strongest argument for TXNM centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.75 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TXNM

The primary concerns for TXNM are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 42.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK profiles as a mature stock while TXNM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

DUK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.40 — expect wider price swings.

DUK is growing revenue faster at 11.3% — sustainability is the question.

TXNM generates stronger free cash flow (-160M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (67/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 15.7% margins and 11.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

TXNM Energy, Inc.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

TXNM Energy, Inc., provides electricity and electric services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?