WallStSmart

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)vsTaseko Mines Ltd (TGB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 4624% more annual revenue ($31.79B vs $672.90M). DUK leads profitability with a 15.6% profit margin vs -4.5%. TGB appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.33. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

DUK

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52

TGB

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.54
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-198.2%)

Margin of Safety

-198.2%

Fair Value

$42.98

Current Price

$127.38

$84.40 premium

UndervaluedFair: $42.98Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TGB.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$98.62B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.1%

TGB2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
45.3%10/10

Revenue surging 45.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.753/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.2%2/10

Earnings declined 2.2%

TGB4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.583/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-4.7%2/10

ROE of -4.7% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-45.5%2/10

Earnings declined 45.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.6% and operating margin at 28.1%.

Bull Case : TGB

The strongest argument for TGB centers on PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 45.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.75 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TGB

The primary concerns for TGB are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.58 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DUK profiles as a mature stock while TGB is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TGB carries more volatility with a beta of 1.89 — expect wider price swings.

TGB is growing revenue faster at 45.3% — sustainability is the question.

TGB generates stronger free cash flow (17M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (59/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 15.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Taseko Mines Ltd

BASIC MATERIALS · COPPER · USA

Taseko Mines Limited, a mining company, acquires, develops and operates mineral properties. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?