WallStSmart

Danaher Corporation (DHR)vsGeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Danaher Corporation generates 5646% more annual revenue ($24.57B vs $427.54M). DHR leads profitability with a 14.7% profit margin vs -4.9%. DHR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

DHR

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

WGS

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: -2.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DHRSignificantly Overvalued (-38.6%)

Margin of Safety

-38.6%

Fair Value

$135.07

Current Price

$187.15

$52.08 premium

UndervaluedFair: $135.07Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WGS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DHR4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$134.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.75B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

WGS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.5%8/10

Revenue surging 26.5% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

DHR3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

WGS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.6%2/10

ROE of -7.6% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-7.44M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-2.392/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DHR

The strongest argument for DHR centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WGS

The strongest argument for WGS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 26.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DHR

The primary concerns for DHR are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : WGS

The primary concerns for WGS are EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DHR profiles as a value stock while WGS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WGS carries more volatility with a beta of 2.15 — expect wider price swings.

WGS is growing revenue faster at 26.5% — sustainability is the question.

DHR generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DHR scores higher overall (60/100 vs 30/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Danaher Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Danaher Corporation is an American globally diversified conglomerate with its headquarters in Washington, D.C.. The company designs, manufactures, and markets professional, medical, industrial, and commercial products and services. The company's 3 platforms are Life Sciences, Diagnostics, and Environmental & Applied Solutions.

GeneDx Holdings Corp.

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Sema4 Holdings Corp. The company is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?