WallStSmart

Danaher Corporation (DHR)vsEdwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Danaher Corporation generates 305% more annual revenue ($24.57B vs $6.07B). EW leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs 14.7%. DHR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.23. DHR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

DHR

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.36

EW

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DHRSignificantly Overvalued (-38.6%)

Margin of Safety

-38.6%

Fair Value

$135.07

Current Price

$187.15

$52.08 premium

UndervaluedFair: $135.07Overvalued
EWSignificantly Overvalued (-544.4%)

Margin of Safety

-544.4%

Fair Value

$12.31

Current Price

$82.67

$70.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.31Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DHR4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$134.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.2%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.75B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

EW1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
23.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%

Areas to Watch

DHR3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
37.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.144/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
45.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-76.6%2/10

Earnings declined 76.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DHR

The strongest argument for DHR centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 23.7%. Revenue growth of 13.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DHR

The primary concerns for DHR are P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 45.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DHR profiles as a value stock while EW is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

DHR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

EW is growing revenue faster at 13.3% — sustainability is the question.

DHR generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DHR scores higher overall (60/100 vs 55/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Danaher Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Danaher Corporation is an American globally diversified conglomerate with its headquarters in Washington, D.C.. The company designs, manufactures, and markets professional, medical, industrial, and commercial products and services. The company's 3 platforms are Life Sciences, Diagnostics, and Environmental & Applied Solutions.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?