WallStSmart

Deere & Company (DE)vsHafnia Limited (HAFN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Deere & Company generates 1697% more annual revenue ($47.93B vs $2.67B). HAFN leads profitability with a 24.7% profit margin vs 10.2%. HAFN trades at a lower P/E of 7.1x. HAFN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 78/100 (B+).

DE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.18

HAFN

Strong Buy

78

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 8.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DE.

HAFNSignificantly Overvalued (-80.2%)

Margin of Safety

-80.2%

Fair Value

$3.68

Current Price

$9.38

$5.70 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DE2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$182.20B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.94B8/10

Generating 1.9B in free cash flow

HAFN6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Revenue GrowthGrowth
47.2%10/10

Revenue surging 47.2% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
266.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 266.7% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
24.7%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.5%

Areas to Watch

DE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.574/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
37.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

HAFN1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DE

The strongest argument for DE centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : HAFN

The strongest argument for HAFN centers on P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.7% and operating margin at 29.5%. Revenue growth of 47.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : DE

The primary concerns for DE are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.29 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : HAFN

The primary concerns for HAFN are Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DE profiles as a declining stock while HAFN is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

DE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

HAFN is growing revenue faster at 47.2% — sustainability is the question.

DE generates stronger free cash flow (1.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HAFN scores higher overall (78/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 24.7% margins and 47.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Deere & Company

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

John Deere is the brand name of Deere & Company, an American corporation that manufactures agricultural, construction, and forestry machinery, diesel engines, drivetrains (axles, transmissions, gearboxes) used in heavy equipment, and lawn care equipment.

Hafnia Limited

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Hafnia Limited owns and operates oil product tankers in Bermuda. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?