WallStSmart

Crane NXT Co (CXT)vsParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 1135% more annual revenue ($20.46B vs $1.66B). PH leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs 8.8%. CXT trades at a lower P/E of 17.3x. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

CXT

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.71

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CXTSignificantly Overvalued (-204.3%)

Margin of Safety

-204.3%

Fair Value

$17.00

Current Price

$43.13

$26.13 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.00Overvalued
PHSignificantly Overvalued (-435.1%)

Margin of Safety

-435.1%

Fair Value

$186.12

Current Price

$921.56

$735.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $186.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CXT3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
17.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.5%8/10

19.5% revenue growth

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$116.70B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

Areas to Watch

CXT3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.714/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.0%2/10

Earnings declined 18.0%

PH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.632/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CXT

The strongest argument for CXT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 19.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bear Case : CXT

The primary concerns for CXT are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CXT profiles as a growth stock while PH is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CXT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.34 — expect wider price swings.

CXT is growing revenue faster at 19.5% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (768M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CXT scores higher overall (54/100 vs 54/100) and 19.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crane NXT Co

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Crane NXT, Co. focuses on payment and merchandising technologies. The company is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?