WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsW. R. Berkley Corp (WRB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

W. R. Berkley Corp generates 1369% more annual revenue ($14.85B vs $1.01B). WRB leads profitability with a 12.6% profit margin vs 11.8%. CWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.93. WRB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

WRB

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WRB.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WRB4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
20.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 20 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
14.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
26.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 26.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

WRB3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.0%4/10

4.0% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.882/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : WRB

The strongest argument for WRB centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WRB

The primary concerns for WRB are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.61 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 5.2% — sustainability is the question.

WRB generates stronger free cash flow (640M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WRB scores higher overall (65/100 vs 53/100). CWT offers better value entry with a 30.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

W. R. Berkley Corp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

W. R. Berkley Corporation is a commercial lines property & casualty insurance holding company organized in Delaware and based in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?