WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsWilliams Companies Inc (WMB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Williams Companies Inc generates 1070% more annual revenue ($11.83B vs $1.01B). WMB leads profitability with a 22.1% profit margin vs 11.8%. CWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.93. WMB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

WMB

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WMB.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WMB4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
41.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
50.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 50.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$92.22B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
22.1%9/10

Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

WMB4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
35.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.532/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.372/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : WMB

The strongest argument for WMB centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.1% and operating margin at 41.2%.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WMB

The primary concerns for WMB are P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a value stock while WMB is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

WMB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.63 — expect wider price swings.

WMB is growing revenue faster at 8.7% — sustainability is the question.

WMB generates stronger free cash flow (244M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WMB scores higher overall (67/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 22.1% margins. CWT offers better value entry with a 30.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Williams Companies Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

The Williams Companies, Inc., is an American energy company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its core business is natural gas processing and transportation, with additional petroleum and electricity generation assets.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?