WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsWipro Limited ADR (WIT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wipro Limited ADR generates 91540% more annual revenue ($926.24B vs $1.01B). WIT leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs 11.8%. WIT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.31. WIT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

WIT

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WIT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WIT4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$26.91B10/10

Generating 26.9B in free cash flow

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

WIT2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-1.6%2/10

Earnings declined 1.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : WIT

The strongest argument for WIT centers on Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.31 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WIT

The primary concerns for WIT are Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.61 — expect wider price swings.

WIT is growing revenue faster at 7.7% — sustainability is the question.

WIT generates stronger free cash flow (26.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WIT scores higher overall (59/100 vs 53/100). CWT offers better value entry with a 30.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Wipro Limited ADR

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

Wipro Limited is a global information technology (IT), consulting and business process services company. The company is headquartered in Bengaluru, India.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?