WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsSouthern Company (SO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Southern Company generates 2762% more annual revenue ($30.18B vs $1.05B). SO leads profitability with a 14.5% profit margin vs 12.6%. CWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.22. CWT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CWT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.72

SO

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+21.7%)

Margin of Safety

+21.7%

Fair Value

$56.40

Current Price

$50.30

$6.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.40Overvalued
SOSignificantly Overvalued (-54.2%)

Margin of Safety

-54.2%

Fair Value

$63.08

Current Price

$93.31

$30.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $63.08Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT4 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.5%8/10

16.5% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
31.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 31.4% YoY

SO3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$105.80B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.8%

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.224/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.7%3/10

ROE of 6.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-80.07M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

SO4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.612/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-0.8%2/10

Earnings declined 0.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.72B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SO

The strongest argument for SO centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SO

The primary concerns for SO are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a growth stock while SO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CWT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.51 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 16.5% — sustainability is the question.

CWT generates stronger free cash flow (-80M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CWT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 56/100) and 16.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Southern Company

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Southern Company is an American gas and electric utility holding company based in the southern United States. It is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with executive offices also located in Birmingham, Alabama.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?