WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsSeaboard Corporation (SEB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Seaboard Corporation generates 864% more annual revenue ($9.75B vs $1.01B). CWT leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs 5.1%. SEB appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.65. SEB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

SEB

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 9.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued
SEBUndervalued (+49.5%)

Margin of Safety

+49.5%

Fair Value

$11019.97

Current Price

$4903.82

$6116.15 discount

UndervaluedFair: $11019.97Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SEB5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
66.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 66.6% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.658/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

SEB3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.1%3/10

5.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
2.7%3/10

Operating margin of 2.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.9%2/10

Revenue declined 2.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SEB

The strongest argument for SEB centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.65 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SEB

The primary concerns for SEB are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.61 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 5.2% — sustainability is the question.

SEB generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SEB scores higher overall (61/100 vs 53/100). CWT offers better value entry with a 30.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Seaboard Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Seaboard Corporation is a global agribusiness and transportation company. The company is headquartered in Merriam, Kansas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?