WallStSmart

CPI Aerostructures Inc (CVU)vsLockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lockheed Martin Corporation generates 104472% more annual revenue ($75.05B vs $71.77M). LMT leads profitability with a 6.7% profit margin vs -1.3%. CVU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.52. LMT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

CVU

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.19

LMT

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.09
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CVU.

LMTUndervalued (+37.5%)

Margin of Safety

+37.5%

Fair Value

$1005.26

Current Price

$624.20

$381.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1005.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CVU2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.528/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LMT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
76.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 77 in profit

Market CapQuality
$144.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.76B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CVU4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$26.71M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.043/10

Elevated debt levels

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.9%2/10

ROE of -3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-27.1%2/10

Revenue declined 27.1%

LMT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
1.6%4/10

1.6% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CVU

The strongest argument for CVU centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.52 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LMT

The strongest argument for LMT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CVU

The primary concerns for CVU are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : LMT

The primary concerns for LMT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 3.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CVU profiles as a turnaround stock while LMT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CVU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.08 — expect wider price swings.

LMT is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

LMT generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LMT scores higher overall (65/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CPI Aerostructures Inc

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

CPI Aerostructures, Inc. is engaged in contract production of aircraft structural parts for fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters in the commercial and defense markets. The company is headquartered in Edgewood, New York.

Visit Website →

Lockheed Martin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Lockheed Martin Corporation is an American aerospace, defense, information security, and technology company with worldwide interests. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, in the Washington, D.C., area.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?