WallStSmart

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A (CTSH)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A generates 58% more annual revenue ($21.41B vs $13.55B). CTSH leads profitability with a 10.4% profit margin vs -1.6%. CTSH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.85. CTSH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CTSH

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 9.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9

WPP

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTSHUndervalued (+76.7%)

Margin of Safety

+76.7%

Fair Value

$304.80

Current Price

$51.68

$253.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $304.80Overvalued
WPPUndervalued (+75.6%)

Margin of Safety

+75.6%

Fair Value

$75.12

Current Price

$18.97

$56.15 discount

UndervaluedFair: $75.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTSH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

PEG RatioValuation
0.858/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CTSH2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
3.6%4/10

3.6% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTSH

The strongest argument for CTSH centers on P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.85 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CTSH

The primary concerns for CTSH are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CTSH profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CTSH carries more volatility with a beta of 0.80 — expect wider price swings.

CTSH is growing revenue faster at 5.8% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CTSH scores higher overall (67/100 vs 32/100). WPP offers better value entry with a 75.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Class A

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

Cognizant is an American multinational technology company that provides business consulting, information technology and outsourcing services. It is headquartered in Teaneck, New Jersey, United States.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?