WallStSmart

Cantaloupe Inc (CTLP)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sonos Inc generates 355% more annual revenue ($1.46B vs $320.82M). SONO leads profitability with a 1.6% profit margin vs 1.1%. SONO trades at a lower P/E of 92.8x. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

CTLP

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 7.3Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CTLPUndervalued (+79.6%)

Margin of Safety

+79.6%

Fair Value

$51.38

Current Price

$11.20

$40.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $51.38Overvalued
SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CTLP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
201.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 201.7% YoY

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CTLP4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$825.82M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
1.5%3/10

ROE of 1.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.1%3/10

1.1% margin — thin

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.88B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CTLP

The strongest argument for CTLP centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : CTLP

The primary concerns for CTLP are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 280.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 92.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

CTLP generates stronger free cash flow (8M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 43/100). CTLP offers better value entry with a 79.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cantaloupe Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Cantaloupe, Inc., a software and payments company, provides technology solutions for the underserved retail market. The company is headquartered in Malvern, Pennsylvania.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?