WallStSmart

CSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW)vsParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 1839% more annual revenue ($20.99B vs $1.08B). PH leads profitability with a 16.6% profit margin vs 10.3%. CSW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.84. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

CSW

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 2.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 1/9

PH

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CSWSignificantly Overvalued (-86.3%)

Margin of Safety

-86.3%

Fair Value

$172.86

Current Price

$266.37

$93.51 premium

UndervaluedFair: $172.86Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CSW1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
34.0%10/10

Revenue surging 34.0% year-over-year

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$105.45B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

Areas to Watch

CSW4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.842/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
40.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-41.2%2/10

Earnings declined 41.2%

PH3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
3.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.2%2/10

Earnings declined 4.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CSW

The strongest argument for CSW centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 34.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.6% and operating margin at 21.5%. Revenue growth of 10.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CSW

The primary concerns for CSW are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 40.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CSW profiles as a growth stock while PH is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

PH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

CSW is growing revenue faster at 34.0% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (881M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (55/100 vs 54/100), backed by strong 16.6% margins and 10.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CSW Industrials, Inc.

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

CSW Industrials, Inc. provides various industrial products in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?