WallStSmart

Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 172% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $4.98B). CSL leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs -1.6%. CSL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.14. CSL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

CSL

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9

WPP

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CSL.

WPPUndervalued (+75.7%)

Margin of Safety

+75.7%

Fair Value

$75.34

Current Price

$18.53

$56.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $75.34Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CSL1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
38.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 38 in profit

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CSL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
9.1x4/10

Trading at 9.1x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.0%2/10

Revenue declined 4.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Earnings declined 3.2%

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CSL

The strongest argument for CSL centers on Return on Equity. PEG of 1.14 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CSL

The primary concerns for CSL are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CSL profiles as a declining stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CSL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.

CSL is growing revenue faster at -4.0% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CSL scores higher overall (54/100 vs 32/100). WPP offers better value entry with a 75.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Carlisle Companies Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Carlisle Companies Incorporated is a diversified manufacturer of engineered products in the United States, Europe, Asia, Canada, Mexico, the Middle East, Africa, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?