WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsWrap Technologies Inc (WRAP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 101419% more annual revenue ($5.09B vs $5.02M). CRWD leads profitability with a -0.6% profit margin vs -298.6%. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 39/100 (F).

CRWD

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

WRAP

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -10.43
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-71.9%)

Margin of Safety

-71.9%

Fair Value

$395.29

Current Price

$671.02

$275.73 premium

UndervaluedFair: $395.29Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WRAP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$176.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.6%8/10

Revenue surging 25.6% year-over-year

WRAP2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
45.2%10/10

Revenue surging 45.2% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
36.9x2/10

Trading at 36.9x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.1%2/10

ROE of -0.1% — below average capital efficiency

WRAP4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$73.02M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-103.8%2/10

ROE of -103.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WRAP

The strongest argument for WRAP centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 45.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : WRAP

The primary concerns for WRAP are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while WRAP is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WRAP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.41 — expect wider price swings.

WRAP is growing revenue faster at 45.2% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (493M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (39/100 vs 21/100) and 25.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Wrap Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL INSTRUMENTS · USA

Wrap Technologies, Inc., a public safety technology and services company, develops policing solutions for law enforcement and security personnel. The company is headquartered in Tempe, Arizona.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?