WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsEnergous Corporation (WATT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 85371% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $5.63M). CRWD leads profitability with a -3.4% profit margin vs -170.4%. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.98

WATT

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -154.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDOvervalued (-11.3%)

Margin of Safety

-11.3%

Fair Value

$400.68

Current Price

$445.75

$45.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $400.68Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WATT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$114.73B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

WATT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
610.0%10/10

Revenue surging 610.0% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.1010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.732/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
25.5x2/10

Trading at 25.5x book value

WATT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$181.21M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-168.0%2/10

ROE of -168.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WATT

The strongest argument for WATT centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 610.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WATT

The primary concerns for WATT are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while WATT is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

WATT is growing revenue faster at 610.0% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (376M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (40/100 vs 21/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Energous Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Energous Corporation develops wireless charging solutions. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?