WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 981% more annual revenue ($52.02B vs $4.81B). UBER leads profitability with a 19.3% profit margin vs -3.4%. CRWD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.37. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.01

UBER

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

UBERSignificantly Overvalued (-122.0%)

Margin of Safety

-122.0%

Fair Value

$32.16

Current Price

$73.08

$40.92 premium

UndervaluedFair: $32.16Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

UBER5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Return on EquityProfitability
39.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Market CapQuality
$150.31B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.1%8/10

Revenue surging 20.1% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.81B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
22.1x2/10

Trading at 22.1x book value

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.3% and operating margin at 12.3%. Revenue growth of 20.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

UBER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (56/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 19.3% margins and 20.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?