WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 96% more annual revenue ($9.43B vs $4.81B). QSR leads profitability with a 8.2% profit margin vs -3.4%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.16. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.01

QSR

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.93
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

QSRSignificantly Overvalued (-295.4%)

Margin of Safety

-295.4%

Fair Value

$17.88

Current Price

$72.92

$55.04 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.88Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

QSR2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
26.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.4%

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
22.1x2/10

Trading at 22.1x book value

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-57.4%2/10

Earnings declined 57.4%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.932/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.12 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (441M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (57/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?