WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 3% more annual revenue ($5.09B vs $4.95B). Q leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs -0.6%. Q appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.70. Q earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

CRWD

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

Q

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 3.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.35
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-72.9%)

Margin of Safety

-72.9%

Fair Value

$396.04

Current Price

$673.02

$276.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $396.04Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for Q.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$176.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.6%8/10

Revenue surging 25.6% year-over-year

Q2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
22.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
17.6%8/10

17.6% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.642/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
37.0x2/10

Trading at 37.0x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.5%2/10

ROE of -0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Q4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
50.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-21.7%2/10

Earnings declined 21.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 17.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 50.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.6% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (493M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

Q scores higher overall (51/100 vs 39/100) and 17.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?