WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsPDF Solutions Inc (PDFS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 2097% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $219.02M). PDFS leads profitability with a -0.3% profit margin vs -3.4%. CRWD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.73. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.98

PDFS

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.5Value: 3.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.63
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDOvervalued (-11.3%)

Margin of Safety

-11.3%

Fair Value

$400.68

Current Price

$445.75

$45.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $400.68Overvalued
PDFSOvervalued (-6.1%)

Margin of Safety

-6.1%

Fair Value

$30.66

Current Price

$42.85

$12.19 premium

UndervaluedFair: $30.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$114.73B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

PDFS2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.6%8/10

Revenue surging 24.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.732/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
25.5x2/10

Trading at 25.5x book value

PDFS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.634/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$1.60B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PDFS

The strongest argument for PDFS centers on Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 24.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : PDFS

The primary concerns for PDFS are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PDFS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.55 — expect wider price swings.

PDFS is growing revenue faster at 24.6% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (376M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (40/100 vs 31/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

PDF Solutions Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

PDF Solutions, Inc. provides proprietary software and physical intellectual property products for integrated circuit designs, electrical measurement equipment, proven methodologies, and professional services in the United States, China, Taiwan, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?