WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsUipath Inc (PATH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 214% more annual revenue ($5.40B vs $1.72B). PATH leads profitability with a 21.0% profit margin vs 0.8%. PATH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.49. PATH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B-).

CRWD

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

PATH

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.50

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$211.69B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.8%8/10

Revenue surging 25.8% year-over-year

PATH4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.4910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
2281.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2281.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Profit MarginProfitability
21.0%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.682/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PATH1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.504/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PATH

The strongest argument for PATH centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.0% and operating margin at 8.9%. Revenue growth of 13.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 5168.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PATH

The primary concerns for PATH are Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD profiles as a growth stock while PATH is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.8% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (406M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PATH scores higher overall (70/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 21.0% margins and 13.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Uipath Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

UiPath Inc. provides an end-to-end automation platform offering a range of robotic process automation (RPA) solutions primarily in the United States, Romania, and Japan. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?