WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsOndas Holdings Inc. (ONDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 2999% more annual revenue ($5.40B vs $174.10M). ONDS leads profitability with a 96.3% profit margin vs 0.8%. ONDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

CRWD

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

ONDS

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.23

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$211.69B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.8%8/10

Revenue surging 25.8% year-over-year

ONDS5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Profit MarginProfitability
96.3%10/10

Keeps 96 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1235.0%10/10

Revenue surging 1235.0% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Return on EquityProfitability
22.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.682/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

ONDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-93.84M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.232/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Operating MarginProfitability
-166.3%1/10

Operating margin of -166.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ONDS

The strongest argument for ONDS centers on Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 96.3% and operating margin at -166.3%. Revenue growth of 1235.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 5168.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ONDS

The primary concerns for ONDS are EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ONDS carries more volatility with a beta of 2.74 — expect wider price swings.

ONDS is growing revenue faster at 1235.0% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (406M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ONDS scores higher overall (50/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 96.3% margins and 1235.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Ondas Holdings Inc.

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Ondas Holdings Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, sells, and supports the FullMAX software-defined radio (SDR) platform in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Nantucket, Massachusetts.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?