WallStSmart

Cirrus Logic Inc (CRUS)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cirrus Logic Inc generates 37% more annual revenue ($2.00B vs $1.46B). CRUS leads profitability with a 20.7% profit margin vs 1.6%. CRUS trades at a lower P/E of 20.9x. CRUS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

CRUS

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.3Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 5.67

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRUSSignificantly Overvalued (-78.4%)

Margin of Safety

-78.4%

Fair Value

$79.14

Current Price

$164.40

$85.26 premium

UndervaluedFair: $79.14Overvalued
SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRUS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.6710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Profit MarginProfitability
20.7%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CRUS1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
9.352/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.83B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRUS

The strongest argument for CRUS centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.7% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : CRUS

The primary concerns for CRUS are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 90.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRUS profiles as a mature stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

CRUS generates stronger free cash flow (149M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRUS scores higher overall (62/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 20.7% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cirrus Logic Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

Cirrus Logic, Inc., a factory-less semiconductor company, offers high-precision, low-power mixed signal processing solutions in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?