WallStSmart

Cirrus Logic Inc (CRUS)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cirrus Logic Inc generates 37% more annual revenue ($1.97B vs $1.44B). CRUS leads profitability with a 20.5% profit margin vs -1.2%. CRUS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

CRUS

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 3.3Quality: 8.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 5.14

SONO

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRUSSignificantly Overvalued (-37.7%)

Margin of Safety

-37.7%

Fair Value

$102.50

Current Price

$163.08

$60.58 premium

UndervaluedFair: $102.50Overvalued
SONOUndervalued (+42.1%)

Margin of Safety

+42.1%

Fair Value

$28.49

Current Price

$14.67

$13.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.49Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRUS4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.1410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Profit MarginProfitability
20.5%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
26.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
26.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 26.1% YoY

SONO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

CRUS2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.5%4/10

4.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
9.352/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.77B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.9%2/10

ROE of -3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.9%2/10

Revenue declined 0.9%

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.2%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRUS

The strongest argument for CRUS centers on Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.5% and operating margin at 26.3%.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CRUS

The primary concerns for CRUS are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRUS profiles as a value stock while SONO is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

CRUS is growing revenue faster at 4.5% — sustainability is the question.

CRUS generates stronger free cash flow (286M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRUS scores higher overall (60/100 vs 42/100), backed by strong 20.5% margins. SONO offers better value entry with a 42.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cirrus Logic Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

Cirrus Logic, Inc., a factory-less semiconductor company, offers high-precision, low-power mixed signal processing solutions in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?