WallStSmart

Ceragon Networks Ltd (CRNT)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 5868% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $335.08M). NOK leads profitability with a 4.0% profit margin vs -0.7%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.22. NOK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (F).

CRNT

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.14

NOK

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRNTUndervalued (+67.2%)

Margin of Safety

+67.2%

Fair Value

$7.14

Current Price

$2.35

$4.79 discount

UndervaluedFair: $7.14Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NOK.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRNT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.209/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$72.01B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CRNT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$214.51M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
3.1%3/10

Operating margin of 3.1%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
8.802/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.8%3/10

ROE of 3.8% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRNT

The strongest argument for CRNT centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.22 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CRNT

The primary concerns for CRNT are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 75.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRNT profiles as a turnaround stock while NOK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRNT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.34 — expect wider price swings.

NOK is growing revenue faster at 2.4% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NOK scores higher overall (40/100 vs 31/100). CRNT offers better value entry with a 67.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ceragon Networks Ltd

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Ceragon Networks Ltd. provides wireless backhaul solutions that enable cellular operators and other wireless service providers to provide voice and data services. The company is headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?