WallStSmart

Charles River Laboratories (CRL)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 16% more annual revenue ($4.64B vs $4.00B). WAT leads profitability with a 3.6% profit margin vs -6.0%. CRL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.12. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

CRL

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.38

WAT

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 2.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRLFair Value (-2.1%)

Margin of Safety

-2.1%

Fair Value

$162.50

Current Price

$277.33

$114.83 premium

UndervaluedFair: $162.50Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-45.9%)

Margin of Safety

-45.9%

Fair Value

$225.66

Current Price

$420.57

$194.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $225.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRL1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1210/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

WAT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
113.4%10/10

Revenue surging 113.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CRL4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.073/10

Elevated debt levels

Return on EquityProfitability
-8.4%2/10

ROE of -8.4% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.7%2/10

Revenue declined 2.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-17.3%2/10

Earnings declined 17.3%

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.574/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRL

The strongest argument for CRL centers on PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.12 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 113.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRL

The primary concerns for CRL are Debt/Equity, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 107.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRL profiles as a turnaround stock while WAT is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.41 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 113.4% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (153M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (45/100 vs 43/100) and 113.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Charles River Laboratories

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., is an American pharmaceutical company specializing in a variety of preclinical and clinical laboratory, gene therapy and cell therapy services for the Pharmaceutical, Medical device and Biotechnology industries. It also supplies assorted biomedical products and outsourcing services for research and development in the pharmaceutical industry and offer support in the fields of basic research, drug discovery, safety and efficacy, clinical support, and manufacturing.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?