WallStSmart

Smart Powerr Corp (CREG)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kenon Holdings generates 332051% more annual revenue ($871.93M vs $262,510). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 0.0%. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (F).

CREG

Avoid

23

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.7Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 4/9

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CREG.

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-40.1%)

Margin of Safety

-40.1%

Fair Value

$54.44

Current Price

$87.72

$33.28 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CREG2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CREG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$18.39M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.3%2/10

ROE of -2.3% — below average capital efficiency

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CREG

The strongest argument for CREG centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CREG

The primary concerns for CREG are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CREG profiles as a value stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CREG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.70 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEN scores higher overall (40/100 vs 23/100) and 43.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Smart Powerr Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - RENEWABLE · China

China Recycling Energy Corporation is engaged in the energy recycling business in China. The company is headquartered in Xi'an, China.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?