WallStSmart

Smart Powerr Corp (CREG)vsDuke Energy Corporation (DUK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 9341780% more annual revenue ($32.72B vs $350,240). DUK leads profitability with a 15.7% profit margin vs 0.0%. CREG trades at a lower P/E of 0.4x. DUK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CREG

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.7Profit: 2.5Value: 8.3Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 6.39

DUK

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CREGUndervalued (+37.6%)

Margin of Safety

+37.6%

Fair Value

$2.05

Current Price

$0.29

$1.76 discount

UndervaluedFair: $2.05Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DUK.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CREG5 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
0.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
425.3%10/10

Revenue surging 425.3% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
6.3910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$97.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.5%

Areas to Watch

CREG4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$7.25M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.7%2/10

ROE of -1.7% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.1%2/10

Earnings declined 9.1%

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.663/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.652/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.58B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CREG

The strongest argument for CREG centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 425.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.7% and operating margin at 25.5%. Revenue growth of 11.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CREG

The primary concerns for CREG are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 1.66 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CREG profiles as a hypergrowth stock while DUK is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CREG carries more volatility with a beta of 2.27 — expect wider price swings.

CREG is growing revenue faster at 425.3% — sustainability is the question.

CREG generates stronger free cash flow (-125,927), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

DUK scores higher overall (67/100 vs 31/100), backed by strong 15.7% margins and 11.3% revenue growth. CREG offers better value entry with a 37.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Smart Powerr Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - RENEWABLE · China

China Recycling Energy Corporation is engaged in the energy recycling business in China. The company is headquartered in Xi'an, China.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?