Cheniere Energy Partners LP (CQP)vsTC Energy Corp (TRP)
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
$64.47
+0.17%
ENERGY · Cap: $30.59B
TRP
TC Energy Corp
$68.68
-0.39%
ENERGY · Cap: $71.02B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
TC Energy Corp generates 36% more annual revenue ($15.48B vs $11.37B). CQP leads profitability with a 22.3% profit margin vs 22.2%. TRP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.45. TRP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).
CQP
Hold46
out of 100
Grade: D+
TRP
Buy55
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+70.6%
Fair Value
$196.51
Current Price
$64.47
$132.04 discount
Margin of Safety
-49.2%
Fair Value
$40.83
Current Price
$68.68
$27.85 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 86 in profit
Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Revenue surging 20.4% year-over-year
Strong operational efficiency at 47.5%
Large-cap with strong market position
Keeps 22 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Generating 1.1B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Trading at 10.6x book value
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 82.4%
Elevated debt levels
Moderate valuation
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 8.5%
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CQP
The strongest argument for CQP centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.3% and operating margin at 10.0%. Revenue growth of 20.4% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : TRP
The strongest argument for TRP centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.2% and operating margin at 47.5%.
Bear Case : CQP
The primary concerns for CQP are Price/Book, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 4.84 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : TRP
The primary concerns for TRP are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.25 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CQP profiles as a growth stock while TRP is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
TRP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.98 — expect wider price swings.
CQP is growing revenue faster at 20.4% — sustainability is the question.
TRP generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
TRP scores higher overall (55/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 22.2% margins. CQP offers better value entry with a 70.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Cheniere Energy Partners LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Cheniere Energy Partners, LP, owns and operates regasification facilities at the Sabine Pass liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, on the Sabine-Neches waterway. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
TC Energy Corp
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
TC Energy Corporation is an energy infrastructure company in North America. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?