Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
$125.13
-1.84%
UTILITIES · Cap: $3.00B
KEN
Kenon Holdings
$87.72
-0.97%
UTILITIES · Cap: $4.57B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation generates 7% more annual revenue ($930.00M vs $871.93M). CPK leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs 7.6%. CPK trades at a lower P/E of 21.0x. CPK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).
CPK
Strong Buy69
out of 100
Grade: B-
KEN
Hold40
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-13.6%
Fair Value
$114.77
Current Price
$125.13
$10.36 premium
Margin of Safety
-40.1%
Fair Value
$54.44
Current Price
$87.72
$33.28 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 28.5%
Revenue surging 20.4% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 21.1% YoY
Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency
7.6% margin — thin
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Earnings declined 93.7%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CPK
The strongest argument for CPK centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 28.5%. Revenue growth of 20.4% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : KEN
The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : CPK
The primary concerns for CPK are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.
Bear Case : KEN
The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CPK profiles as a growth stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.
CPK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.78 — expect wider price swings.
KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.
KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CPK scores higher overall (69/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 15.1% margins and 20.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation
UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA
Chesapeake Utilities Corporation is a power supply company. The company is headquartered in Dover, Delaware.
Visit Website →Kenon Holdings
UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA
Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.
Visit Website →Compare with Other UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?