Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC)vsLas Vegas Sands Corp (LVS)
CPHC
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
$15.84
-0.94%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $82.11M
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp
$42.83
+0.54%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $28.74B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Las Vegas Sands Corp generates 22600% more annual revenue ($13.72B vs $60.44M). LVS leads profitability with a 12.6% profit margin vs 0.2%. LVS trades at a lower P/E of 17.2x. LVS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).
CPHC
Hold35
out of 100
Grade: F
LVS
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-16.1%
Fair Value
$13.50
Current Price
$15.84
$2.34 premium
Margin of Safety
+38.7%
Fair Value
$94.18
Current Price
$42.83
$51.35 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Every $100 of equity generates 302 in profit
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
3.2% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
0.2% margin — thin
Operating margin of 1.6%
Trading at 47.6x book value
Revenue declined 0.7%
Earnings declined 19.8%
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CPHC
The strongest argument for CPHC centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.
Bull Case : LVS
The strongest argument for LVS centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.95 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : CPHC
The primary concerns for CPHC are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. A P/E of 792.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : LVS
The primary concerns for LVS are Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 26.27 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CPHC profiles as a value stock while LVS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
LVS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.82 — expect wider price swings.
CPHC is growing revenue faster at 3.2% — sustainability is the question.
LVS generates stronger free cash flow (360M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
LVS scores higher overall (53/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESORTS & CASINOS · USA
Canterbury Park Holding Corporation organizes mutual wagering on horse racing and unbanked card games at its Canterbury Park racetrack and card casino in Shakopee, Minnesota. The company is headquartered in Shakopee, Minnesota.
Las Vegas Sands Corp
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESORTS & CASINOS · USA
Las Vegas Sands Corporation is an American casino and resort company based in Paradise, Nevada, United States. Its resorts feature accommodations, gambling and entertainment, convention and exhibition facilities, restaurants and clubs, as well as an art and science museum in Singapore.
Visit Website →Compare with Other RESORTS & CASINOS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?