WallStSmart

CenterPoint Energy Inc (CNP)vsVistra Corp. (VST)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vistra Corp. generates 100% more annual revenue ($19.21B vs $9.62B). VST leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 11.6%. VST appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.38. CNP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

CNP

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.57

VST

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.60
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNPSignificantly Overvalued (-71.8%)

Margin of Safety

-71.8%

Fair Value

$22.11

Current Price

$37.84

$15.73 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.11Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VST.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNP3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 23.3% YoY

VST2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3810/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Return on EquityProfitability
40.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Areas to Watch

CNP4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.674/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-592.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.572/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

VST4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
15.7x4/10

Trading at 15.7x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.5%2/10

Revenue declined 5.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-6.2%2/10

Earnings declined 6.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNP

The strongest argument for CNP centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 10.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : VST

The strongest argument for VST centers on PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. PEG of 0.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CNP

The primary concerns for CNP are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 2.14 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : VST

The primary concerns for VST are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 3.63 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNP profiles as a value stock while VST is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

VST carries more volatility with a beta of 1.41 — expect wider price swings.

CNP is growing revenue faster at 10.7% — sustainability is the question.

VST generates stronger free cash flow (133M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNP scores higher overall (66/100 vs 54/100) and 10.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CenterPoint Energy Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

CenterPoint Energy, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 electric and natural gas utility serving several markets in the American states of Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas.

Vistra Corp.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Vistra Corp. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?