WallStSmart

CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH)vsMontrose Environmental Grp (MEG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CNH Industrial N.V. generates 2079% more annual revenue ($18.09B vs $830.54M). CNH leads profitability with a 2.8% profit margin vs -0.1%. CNH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

CNH

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.0Value: 8.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.54

MEG

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNHUndervalued (+45.2%)

Margin of Safety

+45.2%

Fair Value

$23.36

Current Price

$10.08

$13.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $23.36Overvalued
MEGUndervalued (+54.8%)

Margin of Safety

+54.8%

Fair Value

$54.36

Current Price

$21.09

$33.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $54.36Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNH2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.578/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MEG1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CNH4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.544/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

2.8% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.9%3/10

Operating margin of 1.9%

MEG4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$761.01M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNH

The strongest argument for CNH centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.57 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MEG

The strongest argument for MEG centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : CNH

The primary concerns for CNH are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MEG

The primary concerns for MEG are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNH profiles as a value stock while MEG is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

MEG carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

CNH is growing revenue faster at 5.8% — sustainability is the question.

CNH generates stronger free cash flow (533M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNH scores higher overall (57/100 vs 38/100). MEG offers better value entry with a 54.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CNH Industrial N.V.

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

CNH Industrial N.V., an equipment and services company, engages in the design, production, marketing, sale, and financing of agricultural and construction equipment in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, South America, and the Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Basildon, the United Kingdom.

Montrose Environmental Grp

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. is an environmental services company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?